
A Stadium Built for Jerks
Baseball stadiums for people who don't like baseball.
By Michael Brendan Dougherty, September 17, 2008
People who aren't fans of baseball — I call them jerks — often complain of the pacing of the game. It can be soporific. There is no clock counting down, whipping the participants forward. An inning, with no score, can stretch out. The batter steps out of the box to perform a ritualistic set of adjustments to his batting gloves, jersey and helmet, then steps in again. The umpire squats. The pitcher leans over on his front leg, refuses several suggested pitches from his catcher, then pulls back and motions him to come have a discussion closer to the mound. The first basemen lifts his glove over his mouth and joins them. The players return to their positions, the batter calls for time again, knocks a little turf out of cleats. The windup. The pitch. And the announcer, heated with anticipation, calls it "Looping curve. Swing. And a grounder rolllllliiinnng fooouuul," before recounting a set of statistics about this particular hitter, in this particular ballpark, on half-moon nights in August. People who aren't fans of baseball have walked in on me sleeping during a game like this. It's a restful sport, with rhythms that relax rather than rile. The intruders sometimes change the channel to The Hills. My slumber is broken, and in my best bleacher accent, I yell "Hey, hey, hey! I was watching a game here."
Like many newer stadiums, Nationals Ballpark is a place that caters to jerks, while pretending to cater to baseball fans. But before a precise examination of the flaws in the Nationals Ballpark experience, I feel obliged to mention its merits. Despite what seems to be a craven desire to become the Geico Ballpark (the insurance giant's advertising dominates the park), the place is named after its team rather than the company you call when you get sideswiped by a Jeep Wrangler.
Judged strictly by the views it provides of the diamond, it also fares well: Most of the 41,000-odd seats are good. So is access. Because the field sits below street-level, many of the fans can file into their seats without having to climb a staircase or ride an escalator. The walk from the Navy Yard metro stop — just a single block — into center field fires the imagination. The grey flat stone behind the backstop is oddly distinctive and attractive. The stone on the outside of the ballpark evokes the city's other monuments.
And even a snotty traditionalist can't help but sit slack-jawed before the 4,532-square-foot high-definition video screen. Showing replays at a game is an innovation, sure. But, not unwelcome. The sheer size and clarity of the screen gives ticket-holders the pleasure of the living room spectator, the ability to see it again.
The field was properly christened on opening day when Nationals third baseman Ryan Zimmerman launched a whopping walk-off home run to cap the game; as is custom, the fans stormed the field. No better way to begin a stadium's life than having a celebratory mosh-pit at home.
But already on opening night there were problems. Zimmerman's home run caused someone in the ballpark to push a button which sent fireworks into the sky. While Nats fans cheered, they suddenly found debris falling on them — as if the home run had activated an itch in the stadium's scalp and the dandruff was wafting down. Fireworks are now common in modern ballparks and sometimes, as at Shea in New York, leave a pungent and dark cloud lingering over center field. In Nationals Ballpark, the cloud usually climbs up and out of the stadium, as bits of paper flap their way into your nachos. Worse, fireworks are an obnoxious way of interrupting the swelling cheer of a crowd. Instead of enjoying the homer, we are vaguely jolted by something that sounds like mortar fire.
But loud, flashy distractions are the name of the game at Nationals Park. Between innings, the scores disappear from the electronic boards and are replaced by advertisements. So much for taking the time to fill out the score sheet, which is included in the game program, presumably for nostalgia purposes only. People come to games, in part, to enjoy the sport with limited commercial interruption. This consolation is robbed from us.
Like many newer stadiums, Nationals Ballpark is a place that caters to jerks, while pretending to cater to baseball fans. But before a precise examination of the flaws in the Nationals Ballpark experience, I feel obliged to mention its merits. Despite what seems to be a craven desire to become the Geico Ballpark (the insurance giant's advertising dominates the park), the place is named after its team rather than the company you call when you get sideswiped by a Jeep Wrangler.
Judged strictly by the views it provides of the diamond, it also fares well: Most of the 41,000-odd seats are good. So is access. Because the field sits below street-level, many of the fans can file into their seats without having to climb a staircase or ride an escalator. The walk from the Navy Yard metro stop — just a single block — into center field fires the imagination. The grey flat stone behind the backstop is oddly distinctive and attractive. The stone on the outside of the ballpark evokes the city's other monuments.
And even a snotty traditionalist can't help but sit slack-jawed before the 4,532-square-foot high-definition video screen. Showing replays at a game is an innovation, sure. But, not unwelcome. The sheer size and clarity of the screen gives ticket-holders the pleasure of the living room spectator, the ability to see it again.
The field was properly christened on opening day when Nationals third baseman Ryan Zimmerman launched a whopping walk-off home run to cap the game; as is custom, the fans stormed the field. No better way to begin a stadium's life than having a celebratory mosh-pit at home.
But already on opening night there were problems. Zimmerman's home run caused someone in the ballpark to push a button which sent fireworks into the sky. While Nats fans cheered, they suddenly found debris falling on them — as if the home run had activated an itch in the stadium's scalp and the dandruff was wafting down. Fireworks are now common in modern ballparks and sometimes, as at Shea in New York, leave a pungent and dark cloud lingering over center field. In Nationals Ballpark, the cloud usually climbs up and out of the stadium, as bits of paper flap their way into your nachos. Worse, fireworks are an obnoxious way of interrupting the swelling cheer of a crowd. Instead of enjoying the homer, we are vaguely jolted by something that sounds like mortar fire.
But loud, flashy distractions are the name of the game at Nationals Park. Between innings, the scores disappear from the electronic boards and are replaced by advertisements. So much for taking the time to fill out the score sheet, which is included in the game program, presumably for nostalgia purposes only. People come to games, in part, to enjoy the sport with limited commercial interruption. This consolation is robbed from us.
- SINGLE PAGE
- «Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Rating:

Comments
Anonymous
September 20, 2008 12:01 pm
I'm a jerk. Baseball IS booring, but only if you're expecting actual heated competition, and if you're watching it on television. It's a slow duel between pitchers, with the rest of the (probably bored teams) relegated to spending as much time as possible sitting on the bench and eating sunflower seeds.
Live, on the other hand, it's a fun way to spend an evening or an afternoon.
Anonymous
September 20, 2008 12:00 pm
Many of the things you complain about at National have nothing do with pleasing "jerks" (why do jerks enjoy looking at commercials rather than scores?) and have a lot to do with making money for the team owners. As usual, cultural conservatives discover their inner anti-capitalist once the profit motive interferes with their own pleasures.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 2:38 pm
The charge that modern ballparks don't 'trust the show it is ostensibly putting on: a baseball game' seems compelling, but falls short when comparing live baseball to other sporting venues. Pro football and basketball recognized years ago that fans need what to do during down-times in the game; hence, the Lakers' Girls and the Cowboys' Cheerleaders. Baseball is hardly alone in providing mid-game entertainment outside the scope of the sport at play. If anything, one could argue that all such diversions detract from the game,and perhaps reflect our growing overstimulation and shortening attention spans. At the same time, non-sport entertainment at live games can enhance the live viewing experience. For example, I would find it difficult to drag my wife to the Nats or Mets (as a fellow 'double fan') without the racing presidents, Neil Diamond songs, and homerun apple, among other diversions.
As an aside I disagree with the comment that Nats Park is the wring part of the city - I for one hope it helps (re)vitalize the 'waterfront' area.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 2:20 pm
I hate to disagree with all of you, and I am not a parent myself, however I can imagine that if you bring your 7 year old kid to a baseball, after a couple of innings children have a tendency to get antsy.
While you scoff at the idea of an arcade, and a full bar in center field, I think they're great ways to allow parents to enjoy a baseball game along with providing their small children a way to see the game but also, most importantly - the arcade provides an outlet to prevent small chidlren from BOTHERING OTHER FANS.
Its a great stadium, I love baseball, I think nationals park is awesome. I do agree that the workers at the stadium have a poor attitude at times, and the concessions stand did run out of hot dogs one night when I was there. But the fact that you all are dogging a ballpark because it has an arcade which simply allows more people to enjoy the game is ridiculous.
Unless the arcade was literally in centerfield, and it was obstructing you're view, I could understand why you're all so upset about it. These are simple amenities to a stadium. They are there for the enjoyment of the people who need or want to use them.
If you love baseball, you have to love Nationals stadium, and if you don't like it because it has an arcade, then I think you're the jerk.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 2:07 pm
OTOH, Shea is a pit with constant, horribly loud music and scoreboard videos that tell the fans (talk about jerks) when to cheer.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 1:56 pm
As a fellow DC resident and Mets fan, I couldn't agree with you more. Don't forget the arcade behind the right field stands, and of course the massive bar in centerfield. The stadium caters to people who are there to be seen, not to enjoy a baseball game. Of course, considering the apathy of this city towards the Nats, I'm sure they're thrilled to have anybody in the stadium, even if half the people there are either not paying attention or rooting for the other team.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 1:50 pm
I'm a Nationals season ticket holder, and Nationals Park, like most of the new ones, has its benefits and problems. one of my biggest gripes all season long was the removal of the inning and score during commercials. i complained about this to our season ticket account manager, and they assured us "they were working on that". that was in April.
the biggest problem with the new stadium is the continued mismanagement and quality of stadium workers. many of the ushers and most of the consession workers are poor at best. there are a few exceptions, but for the most part, the seat Nazis are worse here at the new park than at any stadium besides Yankee Stadium. and the concessionairres are largely uninterested, uninformed and unhelpful.
but the positives are glowing. the blue seats are awesome and they all point toward the pitcher's mound or home plate. you can see the game from almost anywhere on any concourse, which is helpful when you've got a three inning wait to get nachos. many views from the upper deck can see the Capitol dome, Washington Monument, or look out over the peaceful Anacostia River. the Scoreboard, despite many problems early in the season, is beautiful and the information now well represented after much experimenting and editing.
i must take exception, however, at your use of the word "jerk". while it's true that most new ballparks are more about the baseball "experience" than just the baseball itself. to categorize patrons that come to the park for the experience is naive and misguided. they are still spending their hard-earned money at a baseball game. and if a family comes out and one of the kids falls in love with the game while they are there for the experience, then isn't that worth having the Build-a-Bear store on the premises?
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 12:13 pm
Sometimes I feel like a crabby old man. I liked 'em better in the old days.
I've been to most of the new stadiums, and the characterization of the Nats' new park as "a place that caters to jerks" is one that applies to many of them. The game itself isn't enough to get 30,000+ out to the park every night, and wringing every possible cent of revenue out of each of them requires a disgusting disrespect for the game itself.
The new park in Washington commits the cardinal sin of not building the park into the natural wonders of the city itself.
Of the new stadiums check out Coors in Denver and AT&T in San Francisco. They do the best job of bringing you traditional baseball in a gorgeous natural setting without selling out to corporate interests.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 12:09 pm
Baseball stadia and games have become like most other entertainments: an opportunity to shove more advertising at you. This has gone well beyond the commercials that used to be the tolerable interruptions of radio and television. Entertainment is just the backround.
And, for the record, I must be a 'jerk,' since I do not like baseball. However, if I attend, I want to see the game.
Anonymous
September 18, 2008 11:57 am
The House That Ruth Built has been gone for more than 30 years. The thing standing there now is a pale imitation.
Most Popular
Culture11 Poll
Should we bail out the Big Three?












